The Thoughts and Writings of Nancy Salvato
  • Home
  • This Site
  • Analysis
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Links
  • Home

Why Are Marriage Licenses Required?

6/27/2015

2 Comments

 
The following is an excerpt from 
Marriage Licenses Are A Racist Crime Against Humanity

George Washington was married without a marriage license.  So, how did we come to this place in America where marriage licenses are issued?

Historically, all the states in America had laws outlawing the marriage of blacks and whites. In the mid-1800’s, certain states began allowing interracial marriages or miscegenation as long as those marrying received a license from the state. In other words they had to receive permission to do an act which without such permission would have been illegal.

Blacks Law Dictionary points to this historical fact when it defines “marriage license” as, “A license or permission granted by public authority to persons who intend to intermarry.”“Intermarry” is defined in Black’s Law Dictionary as, “Miscegenation; mixed or interracial marriages.”

Give the State an inch and they will take a 100 miles (or as one elderly woman once said to me “10,000 miles.”) Not long after these licenses were issued, some states began requiring all people who marry to obtain a marriage license. In 1923, the Federal Government established the Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act (they later established the Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act). By 1929, every state in the Union had adopted marriage license laws.



Read More
2 Comments

Activist Judges Centralizing our Government

6/27/2015

0 Comments

 
“The endgame for some in the LGBT rights movement involves centralized state power—and the end of First Amendment freedoms.”

A Warning from Canada: Same-Sex Marriage Erodes Fundamental Rights 

Think about what happened in both court cases.  1) a blatant disregard for the 10th Amendment, 2) blurring the powers of the legislative and judicial branches, 3) a disregard for the 9th Amendment, all of which work to centralize power and determine what we must believe, Progressives are so far ahead of us at creating a national government and socialist state. We need to walk away from the bright shiny thing and consider what has happened from a strictly constitutional lens. 

The following are more excerpts from the above link.

“When same-sex marriage was legalized in Canada in 2005, parenting was immediately redefined. Canada’s gay marriage law, Bill C-38, included a provision to erase the term “natural parent” and replace it across the board with gender-neutral “legal parent” in federal law. Now all children only have “legal parents,” as defined by the state. By legally erasing biological parenthood in this way, the state ignores children’s foremost right: their immutable, intrinsic yearning to know and be raised by their own biological parents.”

“Same-sex marriage not only deprives children of their own rights to natural parentage, it gives the state the power to override the autonomy of biological parents, which means parental rights are usurped by the government.”

“In Canada, it is considered discriminatory to say that marriage is between a man and a woman or that every child should know and be raised by his or her biological married parents. It is not just politically incorrect in Canada to say so; you can be saddled with tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees, fined, and forced to take sensitivity training.”

“Parents can expect state interference when it comes to moral values, parenting, and education—and not just in school. The state has access into your home to supervise you as the parent, to judge your suitability. And if the state doesn’t like what you are teaching your children, the state will attempt to remove them from your home.”

“Teachers cannot make comments in their social networks, write letters to editors, publicly debate, or vote according to their own conscience on their own time. They can be disciplined or lose any chance of tenure. They can be required at a bureaucrat’s whim to take re-education classes or sensitivity training, or be fired for thinking politically incorrect thoughts.”

“When same-sex marriage was created in Canada, gender-neutral language became legally mandated. Newspeak proclaims that it is discriminatory to assume a human being is male or female, or heterosexual. So, to be inclusive, special non-gender-specific language is being used in media, government, workplaces, and especially schools to avoid appearing ignorant, homophobic, or discriminatory. A special curriculum is being used in many schools to teach students how to use proper gender-neutral language.”

“Americans also need to understand that the endgame for some in the LGBT rights movement involves centralized state power—and the end of First Amendment freedoms.”
0 Comments
    Picture

    Author

    Nancy Salvato’s education career includes teaching students from pre-k to graduate school.  She has also worked as an administrator in higher education. Her private sector efforts focus on the advancement of constitutional literacy. She attended the National Endowment for the Humanity’s National Academy for Civics & Government, and is the author of “Keeping a Republic: An Argument for Sovereignty.”

    Archives

    July 2016
    January 2016
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015

    Categories

    All
    1st Amendment
    2nd Amendment
    Activist Judges
    Centralized Government
    Flags
    Gore Vidal
    ISIS
    Marriage License
    Posse Comitatus
    Presidential Election
    William F. Buckley

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.